A tool that doesn't do the thinking for children — it teaches them to build and steer a learning system of their own. They understand it, extend it and steer it themselves instead of consuming ready-made answers. The building itself is the point of the learning.
Didactically guided, supervised, data-minimal. The same calm system as for work, thought through here for the school setting.
The same path as for work, read here as a learning progression: from asking to repeating to building and steering.
The child asks and doesn't get a solution — they get a question back that sets their own thinking in motion.
What works becomes a fixed routine the child recognizes and can name.
The child builds a station of their own, with a role and a routine. The building is exactly the point of the learning.
The child steers their system, checks sources and decides what stays stored.
An anonymized proof run: the math stays with the child, the buddy takes the monotony. Oversight and boundaries are built in.
Three steps the child takes on their own. The building is the point of the learning, not the shortcut.
The child explains what they need: clean problems, no solutions. They understand what their tool is supposed to do.
They add a rule: "After ten problems, give me harder ones." The station grows with their skill.
They decide that solutions stay hidden until they've done the math themselves. The child steers their system.
The buddy takes the copying load, not the math. What the child is practicing, they keep practicing themselves. The tool is built for self-efficacy, not for shortcuts.
No child account of their own, first name only, no sensitive data. The hard gate is always an adult.
The child works in an accompanied parent or school account. There is no standalone child account.
First name only in the system. No school, address, health or family data.
Nothing gets sent, bought or deleted without the deliberate yes of an adult.
Whoever accompanies the child sees what's being worked on. Transparency instead of a black box.
An anonymized proof run. No children's names, no family details. The demo content is illustrative, true to the spirit of the original.
The Socratic principle is a hard rule here, not a feature. The tool is built for self-efficacy, not for the shortcut to a finished answer.
Children build their own system instead of consuming ready-made answers. Understand, extend, steer. The building itself is the point of the learning.
No child account of their own, first name only, no sensitive data, clear oversight logic. The hard gate: nothing goes out without a yes.
Data sovereignty isn't preached — it's practiced. The child maintains what their system knows about them, and learns critical distance through their own practice.
The tool requires an adult's Claude account; the software is made by Anthropic and rated 18+. The child uses it supervised, never in an account of their own. The technology is at an early stage, in research preview — and that's exactly why we accompany the setup personally.
The question that carries it all: Is the child learning to build a tool, or only to operate one?
Whether the education world becomes a product of its own is something we'll decide together with the first schools. Instead of inventing an offer, we're transparent about what would stand here later.
Deliberately without a price and without a package for now. We don't want to claim an offer that doesn't exist yet. Whatever grows here will come out of the first real pilots.
Low-key and non-binding. Tell us a little about your setting, and we'll get back to you for an intro call. No sales pressure, no price tag.
The same calm mechanics, each in its own language. Not three products — three worlds.